EU Report: GOPACS as a blueprint for the power grid of the future

17 April 2026
Specification and design criteria for local flexibility markets

The pressure on our electricity grid is felt daily. For entrepreneurs, this often means waiting for a connection, while we are simultaneously in the midst of a full-scale sustainability transition. However, there is good news from Brussels. In a recent report from the European Commission on local flexibility markets, the Dutch approach via GOPACS is highlighted as an international textbook example.

The report confirms what we at the joint grid operators have known for a long time: we cannot solve ‘grid congestion’ with more cables alone, but primarily through smarter collaboration. By pooling the strengths of national and regional grid operators, we make it easier than ever for large business customers and service providers to monetise their flexible capacity. In this article, we dive into the key conclusions of the EU and show how this vision is already ensuring a more accessible and reliable energy grid today.

Relieving the grid together

The recognition from the European Commission underlines that we are on the right track in the Netherlands. Making smarter use of our electricity grid is not a distant dream, but a joint task from which we are already reaping the benefits. By creating space on the grid through GOPACS, we work together to ensure that the energy transition does not stall, but actually accelerates. For you as an entrepreneur, this means not only a social contribution to a sustainable Netherlands, but also a concrete opportunity to achieve a return from your flexible capacity.

What does the report say?

1. Necessity of coordination between grid operators

A central conclusion is that congestion management is no longer an individual task for a single grid operator. There is a strict necessity for integrated coordination between transmission system operators (TSOs) and distribution system operators (DSOs). This prevents actions by one operator from leading to new problems (such as overloading) on the network of the other operator.

2. Integration with existing markets

The report states that local markets should not be isolated “islands.” The most successful models utilise market coupling: linking local congestion solutions to regular trading markets (such as the intraday market). This increases liquidity and makes it easier for market parties to participate, as they can continue to use their existing trading strategies.

3. The role of the consumer and CSP

To obtain a sufficient supply of flexibility, the barriers to market access must be lowered.

  • Standardisation: By harmonising products and technical interfaces, service providers (CSPs) can scale more easily across different regions and countries.
  • Value Stacking: It must be possible for end users to monetise their flexibility in multiple markets simultaneously (for example, for both imbalance and congestion management).

4. Location information is crucial

In contrast to the national energy market, where the location of production or consumption is often less relevant, location data is essential for local markets. The report concludes that market designs must be able to filter specifically by where an installation is located to effectively solve “grid congestion.”

5. Social interest and cost savings

The smart deployment of flexibility is seen by the EU as a direct alternative to, or supplement to, physical grid reinforcement. This leads to:

  • Faster connection: Companies have to wait less time for grid capacity.
  • Lower social costs: Less investment is needed in copper and excavation work if we distribute existing capacity more intelligently.

6. GOPACS as the ‘Enabling Frontier’ for integration

The report identifies GOPACS as a crucial practical example (case study) of how the EU’s theoretical goals are being put into practice. While many regions still struggle with the separation between local and national markets, GOPACS shows that a direct link with the intraday market minimizes the threshold for market parties. It does not function as an additional marketplace that entrepreneurs must visit separately, but as a smart ‘layer’ on top of existing trade, whereby flexibility is automatically deployed where the grid needs it most.

The report underlines this with the following conclusion:
“The GOPACS initiative represents a landmark in TSO-DSO coordination, demonstrating that by integrating local congestion needs directly into wholesale market processes, we can unlock flexibility at scale without fragmenting the energy landscape.”

Get started right away?

Are you curious about the possibilities for your specific connection or region? The regional grid operators are ready to help you with the next step. Click on your grid operator to go directly to the relevant information about congestion management and flexibility:

  • Liander: Find out how you, as a large business customer, can create and utilise capacity (in Dutch).
  • Enexis: Let us know if you’re interested in congestion management (in Dutch).
  • Stedin: Make use of your flexible capacity and read more about it (in Dutch).
  • TenneT: Information on studies into congestion management (in Dutch).

Not sure who your grid operator is?

Check your postcode in the EAN codebook or look under ‘Large Business‘ for an overview of how we connect you and your grid operator.

Download the report

EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Directorate-General for Energy Directorate C
Green Transition and Energy System Integration
Unit C3 – Internal Energy Market
Rapport: specification and design criteria for local flexibility-MJ0126015ENN

source: Rapport: specification and design criteria for local flexibility-MJ0126015ENN

News

All news